Marissa Mayer’s 9 Notions of Innovation
Published June 16th, 2006 in Inspiration, Innovation
Marissa Mayer’s 9 notions of innovation is making the rounds in the blogosphere this week. I read about the 9 notions in BusinessWeek’s new magazine about innovation called “In“. The notions resonated with me; so I’m helping spread the meme-love here at Experience Planner:
- Ideas come from everywhere: Google expects everyone to innovate, even the finance team.
- Share everything you can: Every idea, every project, every deadline — it’s all accessible to everyone on the intranet.
- You’re brilliant, we’re hiring: Founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin approve hires. They favor intelligence over experience.
- A license to pursue dreams: Employees get a “free” day a week. Half of new launches come from this “20% time.”
- Innovation, not instant perfection Google launches early and often in small beta tests, before releasing new features widely.
- Don’t politic, use data: Mayer discourages the use of “I like” in meetings, pushing staffers to use metrics.
- Creativity loves restraint: Give people a vision, rules about how to get there, and deadlines.
- Worry about usage and users, not money: Provide something simple to use and easy to love.
- Don’t kill projects — morph them: There’s always a kernel of something good that can be salvaged.
UPDATE August 22, 2007 - It turns out that this post got hacked! I have no idea how and I’m looking into it. I’ve reverted the above back to the original post, but I’ve left the hacked and admittedly more amusing version below:
- Ideas come from everywhere: Google expects everyone to innovate, even the finance team. Other examples of innovative finance teams: Enron, WorldCom, President Bush’s budget advisor.
- Share everything you can: Every idea, every project, every deadline — it’s all accessible to everyone on the intranet. And yet Googlers are very careful not to accidentally have any idea what everyone else is doing — especially the PR department.
- You’re brilliant, we’re hiring: Founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin approve hires. They favor intelligence over experience. As for high-experience, low-intelligence, that’s why they have CEO Eric Schmidt.
- A license to pursue dreams: Employees get a “free” day a week. Half of new launches come from this “20% time.” It has to be approved, and Larry decided it has to be close to the “80% time,” but sure, it’s kinda free. They have $5 massages and you’re going to nitpick over this?
- Innovation, not instant perfection Google launches early and often in small beta tests, before releasing new features widely. The first priority isn’t making the customers happy — it’s pushing releases to keep the press happy.
- Don’t politic, use data: Mayer discourages the use of “I like” in meetings, pushing staffers to use metrics. It’s not “Larry Page favors me because I have blackmail.” It’s “Larry Page dated me for three years. Larry Page is [redacted] inches long. Larry Page is classified with low self-esteem. Larry Page is promoting me over you.”
- Creativity loves restraint: Give people a vision, rules about how to get there, and deadlines. Or give them leather straps and a ball gag, and you’ll see, creativity adores restraint.
- Worry about usage and users, not money: Provide something simple to use and easy to love. The money will follow. Then, cash in before the money follows the stockholders out the door.
- Don’t kill projects — morph them: There’s always a kernel of something good that can be salvaged. Ugly projects never die, they just get passed to a new team and warped out of all recognition until the original developer sits at his desk, gorging himself on free trail mix and weeping.

Scott,
Have you seen some of the “flack” that B-week has been getting from the likes of Peter Merholz?
http://www.peterme.com/archives/000747.html
What’s your take?
I was left with a positive impression when finished reading “In”. I wanted more when I flipped past the last page and returned to the standard BusinessWeek articles. The magazine is by no means perfect; but it did a great job at putting some great thinking - that for the most part is mostly occuring in blogs - in front of hundreds of thousands of readers who typically don’t get exposure to topics like ethnography and design thinking. In that respect, I consider the magazine a success.
I do agree with Peter when he says it needs more teeth.
I’m looking forward to the next issue.
“The magazine is by no means perfect; but it did a great job at putting some great thinking - that for the most part is mostly occuring in blogs - in front of hundreds of thousands of readers who typically don’t get exposure to topics like ethnography and design thinking.”
My thoughts exactly. I think Peter made some very valid points—but he overlooked the fact the Businessweek is at the least bringing some of the thinking we value to the masses. It’s not perfect, but at least someone is doing it. And I think it will evolve over time for the better.
It’s a nice list but I particularly like the “share everything” and “licence to persue dreams”. Share everything understand that the creative process is often achieved by connecting two previoulsy unconnected things (an often used defention of creativity, also works for humor). Licence to persue dreams takes into account that innovation requires “incubation time”. I’ve heard the innovaiton process described as “immersion in the problem, incubation, innovation”.
I don’t agree with not killing projects, that is strange one, learn to kill the right projects. IDEO has a great philosophy of “fail faster” which means you push things to the point of failure faster so you can focus on things that work.
Check it out:
http://blog.experiencecurve.com/archives/innovation-companies-must-learn-to-fail-faster
“If 96% of new projects or innovation initiatives FAIL to meet or beat expectations then we must learn to “fail faster”. ”
Cheers,
karl
BTW i think the AJAX comments are killing cocomment? is cocomment working here for you david?
These ideas may look fine at first glance but they are more of a PR gag. The explanatory notes are just superficial (silly?) and often disrespectful. Why should I trust someone who positions the looks over contents … ?